tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34993014.post2013590712649357638..comments2024-01-13T10:12:47.756+00:00Comments on Ranting Stan: The real "deniers"Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34993014.post-15641141522284437692009-12-06T22:07:24.713+00:002009-12-06T22:07:24.713+00:00It's not just the emails. There are lines of c...It's not just the emails. There are lines of code for their climate model program, suitably commented by programmer Ian 'Harry' Harris...<br /><br />'The problem is that the synthetics are incorporated at 2.5-degrees, NO IDEA why, so saying they affect particular 0.5-degree cells is harder than it should be. So we'll just gloss over that entirely ;0)<br /><br />ARGH. Just went back to check on synthetic production. Apparently - I have no memory of this at all - we're not doing observed rain days! It's all synthetic from 1990 onwards. So I'm going to need conditionals in the update program to handle that. And separate gridding before 1989. And what TF happens to station counts?<br /><br />OH **** THIS. It's Sunday evening, I've worked all weekend, and just when I thought it was done I'm hitting yet another problem that's based on the hopeless state of our databases. There is no uniform data integrity, it's just a catalogue of issues that continues to grow as they're found.'<br /><br />Classic stuff....<br /><br />~Fatbob~Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34993014.post-64536401432078703842009-12-03T09:23:00.629+00:002009-12-03T09:23:00.629+00:00It did get a mention on the BBC I heard a referenc...It did get a mention on the BBC I heard a reference to it on BBC Radio 4 news and the documents were said to have been 'stolen' not leaked obtained or acquired. Interesting that previous stories that had come from the Home Office et al were always leaked never stolen.Malthebofhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03503702120391804624noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34993014.post-30554083779547545642009-12-01T20:49:02.996+00:002009-12-01T20:49:02.996+00:00The Beeb are still perpetuating the myth with toda...The Beeb are still perpetuating the myth with today's "Antarctica's melting and we're all going to die" story.<br /><br />LFAT, climate fraudsters would be a more apt description.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34993014.post-70565695807663603742009-12-01T09:23:04.689+00:002009-12-01T09:23:04.689+00:00Indeed, the tables have been turned. Maybe we sho...Indeed, the tables have been turned. Maybe we should call them 'climate fixers' or 'climate fudgers'?Letters From A Toryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14612766550608940053noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34993014.post-87435849373495361862009-12-01T09:03:31.705+00:002009-12-01T09:03:31.705+00:00These people are NOT scientists. No real scientist...These people are NOT scientists. No real scientist ever destroys the basic data that was used in his research just in case it is needed to replicate his findings at some future date.<br />Nor does any real scientist ever say that the issue is settled. For centuries everyone believed that "matter was immutable" until Einstein came along and proved matter could be converted into energy!<br />No, they are not scientists, just another political pressure group!Brian E.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34993014.post-69355416288113769622009-11-30T14:52:04.061+00:002009-11-30T14:52:04.061+00:00I was wondering how long it would take you to cove...I was wondering how long it would take you to cover this, Stan. <br /><br />I've known all along that this was happening, and I think that any person with an iota of common sense knew it was happening. It's a massive fraud, and I can't believe that in the light of recent revelations that Gordon Brown and Obama are still getting positive media coverage regarding their twitterings in Copenhagen.<br /><br />World's gone mad.Lightf00thttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06877243443796054197noreply@blogger.com