Friday, December 19, 2008

Missing: One plot - if found, please return to progressive liberalism

Yep, they've completely lost the plot. In today's Times comment section, Melanie Reid suggests bringing back slavery.

We must make people do something for nothing.

This isn't the same as making criminals do community service - they are working off what they owe society (allegedly), this is about making you and I work for nothing.

So exactly how much unpaid work do you do in a month? Going to the gym, cooking, taxiing the children, loading the dishwasher - none of that counts. This must be time given freely to other people or organisations - benefiting them, not you.

Reid is concerned that there aren't enough volunteers these days. She seems to think it's because we all lead such busy lives.

Yes, thought so. You're too busy in the day job. You barely have the energy outside work to do anything for yourself, let alone your family. You even get resentful having to visit your mother.

You are but an empty husk, your resources spent on yourself, your immediate family and your bank account. How on earth can you be expected to do stuff for people you don't know and don't care about? Especially now, in a recession?

This is trite nonsense. The suggestion that we're all too busy now to do volunteer work is frankly absurd. With more labour saving devices than ever we have more spare time than ever - the difference is that we have more things to fill our leisure time with than ever before so we kid ourselves that we're "busy".

Back in the fifties gyms were for boxers. Now everyone has gym membership which they use once a month or so. In the fifties cooking a meal required shopping for the ingredients daily, peeling, chopping, preparing and cooking - it took hours. Now we just slam a M&S ready meal in the oven for 25 minutes and dinner is done. Washing up takes five minutes loading the dishwasher (honestly, how arduous is that?).

When that is all done there is the television, Internet or countless other home entertainments to enjoy till the small hours of the morning. In the fifties there was two hours of telly (if you were lucky enough to own one) or the radio.

Today we can go out to bars, clubs, restaurants and so on till late the next day - back in the fifties there was the cinema or the pub and they shut at half ten. We have more time, but more things to fill our time with - we're certainly not "busier" than our parents or our parents parents. During the war, people would work all day then spend the night fire watching - and still get up for work the next day!

To be fair to Reid, her motivation is admirable. Her approach isn't.

What we must do, I suggest, is introduce a new concept of universal compulsory volunteering ..... It might be giving financial advice to a charity, walking dogs, mentoring young offenders, gardening for the elderly. People could choose; but they must make a commitment.

We do need more volunteers, but forcing it on people is not the way forward. The first thing she needs to understand is that most people feel they "already gave at the office".

By that I mean that the state now fulfils many of the traditional roles of volunteer work and pays people to do it. They can only do that because they take taxes from the workers in the private sector to pay those people - so those who pay taxes to support the public sector already feel like they've made a contribution.

A far better idea would be to give tax breaks to those who volunteer. All one would need to do is complete your yearly voluntary work, get a certificate from the charity you worked for, send it to the tax office and they would increase your tax free income for next year by £500 or so. A simple incentive which many would take up. The money lost in taxation would be recouped by reducing many of the services the state provides which are once more being performed by volunteers. It pays for itself.

It's a typically liberal progressive approach to use punitive methods to "encourage" people to do something rather than proper incentives. More people would recycle if, as they do in the USA, they gave incentives for people to do it rather than threaten punishment if you don't - but the liberal left doesn't think that way.

They lost the plot a long time ago - in fact, I don't think they ever had it.


Anonymous said...

"compulsory volunteering"

Does not compute!

Anonymous said...

I think she has a fundamental misunderstanding of what the word 'volunteer' means.

In fact, I think she has a fundamental misunderstanding in general. Still, "compulsory volunteering" must be the quintissential New Labour phrase.

Lorenzo said...

Think of the perfect civilisation, now think of the least perfect civilisation. There your are, back to reality!

DJ said...

What Everyone said, re: compulsory volunteering, plus 'dog walking'?

How much of a bum do you have to be to want someone else to walk your dog?

Anonymous said...

So this stupid bitch wants to force other people to give up their time to help with her pet projects? Good. Send her parents to a salt mine.

I find your idea of a tax concession revolutionary and innovative. However, the checks to be done on one's character and the data assembled by the State might deter some of us from participating.

Stan said...

"I find your idea of a tax concession revolutionary and innovative. However, the checks to be done on one's character and the data assembled by the State might deter some of us from participating."

I understand what you mean - it seems like everything you want to do requires a CRB check - but there are plenty of things people can volunteer for that don't require CRB checks, but could still count towards their "quota".

I'd like to see some sanity brought back into volunteering so that CRB checks (which are intrusive as you say) are not necessary. A couple of referees should be suitable in many cases - anything which would not deter people from volunteering.

Anonymous said...

Have I missed something here? If one were forced to volunteer, then surely, that's not volunteering. That's being press-ganged into doing something I do not want to do. If I wanted to walk a dog, I'd get a dog., If I wanted to offer impartial financial advice to complete morons, I would do. I don't so I'm not.

My time is my own. I will choose how to use it.

Anonymous said...

A片,A片,A片,A片,A片,A片情趣商品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣用品,情趣商品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣用品,情趣商品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣用品,,情趣,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品.情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,視訊聊天室,情趣,情趣用品,情趣,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣麻將,台灣彩卷,六合彩開獎號碼,運動彩卷,六合彩,遊戲,線上遊戲,cs online,搓麻將,矽谷麻將,明星三缺一, 橘子町,麻將大悶鍋,台客麻將,公博,game,,中華職棒,麗的線上小遊戲,國士無雙麻將,麻將館,賭博遊戲,威力彩,威力彩開獎號碼,龍龍運動網,史萊姆,史萊姆好玩遊戲,史萊姆第一個家,史萊姆好玩遊戲區,樂透彩開獎號碼,遊戲天堂,天堂,好玩遊戲,遊戲基地,無料遊戲王,好玩遊戲區,麻將遊戲,好玩遊戲區,小遊戲,電玩快打情趣用品,情趣,A片,AIO,AV,AV女優,A漫,免費A片,情色,情色貼圖,色情小說,情色文學,色情,寄情竹園小遊戲,色情遊戲,AIO交友愛情館,色情影片,情趣內衣,情趣睡衣,性感睡衣,情趣商品,微風成人,嘟嘟成人網,成人,18成人,成人影城,成人圖片,成人貼圖,成人圖片區,UT聊天室,聊天室,豆豆聊天室 ,哈啦聊天室,尋夢園聊天室,聊天室尋夢園,080苗栗人聊天室,080聊天室,視訊交友網,視訊借錢,黃金,黃金回收,黃金價格,黃金買賣,當舖,中古車,二手車A片,A片,成人網站,成人影片,色情,情色網,情色,AV,AV女優,成人影城,成人,色情A片,日本AV,免費成人影片,成人影片,SEX,免費A片,A片下載,免費A片下載,做愛,情色A片,色情影片,H漫,A漫,18成人,情色電影,自拍,成人電影a片,色情影片,情色電影,a片,色情,情色網,情色,av,av女優,成人影城,成人,色情a片,日本av,免費成人影片,成人影片,情色a片,sex,免費a片,a片下載,免費a片下載,成人網站,做愛,自拍A片,A片,A片下載,做愛,成人電影,18成人,日本A片,情色小說,情色電影,成人影城,自拍,情色論壇,成人論壇,情色貼圖,情色,免費A片,成人,成人光碟18成人,成人聊天室,成人電影,成人圖片,成人貼圖,成人圖片區,成人影片,成人文章,成人小說,微風成人區,成人交友,成人文學,成人漫畫,成人遊戲,免費成人影片 ,成人論壇,愛情公寓,情色,色情網站,情色A片,色情小說,情色文學